by The actor who plays Kang the Conqueror in the MCU, Jonathan Majors, has spoken out about the unfavourable critiques Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania received after its debut.
Jonathan Majors made his MCU debut as Kang the Conqueror in Ant-Man 3 last month. Unfortunately, despite all the anticipation, Quantumania failed to live up to expectations, receiving the lowest audience rating in the franchise and the worst critic Rotten Tomatoes score in the history of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Majors continues to garner fan love for his performance as Kang despite all the criticism in a number of key areas, and he also receives recognition for his acting in the bodybuilding drama Magazine Dreams and the boxing epic Creed 3.
Kang from the MCU responds to the Ant-Man: Quantum reviews
Jonathan Majors, who plays Kang, addressed the criticism of Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania in an interview with IndieWire, saying that it “doesn’t change how [he sees himself].”
The newest member of the MCU explained that he is merely “a performance within a story”:
“Well, I can jump to the end: It doesn’t change how I see myself, period. And the middle of the sandwich is… It’s all data, it’s all data. I think about… I’m a performance within a story. One thing I will say to my team after we’re leaving a premiere if everyone’s reading reviews, I’ll say, ‘How’s the movie doing? How’s the movie doing? How’s the movie doing?’ I try to clean my plate and take care of my part. And the response is: ‘You’re straight. You’re good. They like you.’ And then they tell me about the movie. And then, sometimes the movie is also on that level, and sometimes the movie [isn’t].”
Majors went on to discuss how everyone “have an opinion,” which might bring about various viewpoints:
“But then you realize: it’s people. It goes back to what we were saying before, why I listen to you guys. They have an opinion. You always have an opinion… I’m no fool. I got 33 years of living, real living, where I go, ‘I know these are people writing it,’ right? These aren’t my Yale professors. These are not my NCA drama teachers. These are people who have kids and have a perspective, who probably have a religious upbringing or a lack there of, or live in this town, or live in this town, or want to be seen in this way, or don’t like being seen in this way.”
He continued by asking, “What does that 47 imply when you also received this amount of box office?” in reference to Ant-Man 3’s 47% reviewer score on Rotten Tomatoes.
“So, I go, ‘Ok, cool…’ I look at the aggregate and, ‘Ok, cool, 47. Great…’ But what does that 47 mean when you also got this X amount of box office? … What do these things mean? In my opinion, it’s information, depending on who I’m talking to.”
Majors continued by expressing his ideas about how “art is inherently political,” making theatres and the arts akin to “the sort of democracy”:
“But, I am in the know. I won’t play myself. If you are a critic on the level, I’ll probably know you… and understand your politics. That’s also what it comes down to… ‘Art doesn’t have to be political, because art is inherently political.’ And if theater and art is the sort of democracy, which I believe, critics are political writers. You are a political writer. I am an actor, a politician, a citizen. All these things are true. All these things are true. I find it quite fascinating.”
The Avengers 5 actor went on to say that he is “a human being like anybody else:”
“That said, I’m a human being like anybody else. Someone says something crazy about the movie, I go, ‘Aw man.’ We got Creed [3] coming out, right? My team’s telling me about tracking and I say, ‘Wait, yeah, yeah, yeah… but don’t forget, we still got Ant-Man [and The Wasp: Quantumania] going, you know? We can’t forget about this kid, because we got this kid coming!’”
Majors went on to describe how he comes to be “invested in these things,” urging viewers and reviewers to recognise the time that goes into making these films and how the feedback affects those involved:
“And that’s speaking to my heart, to my feelings. Because I’m invested in these things. That’s the other part. Like, guys, the artist and filmmakers that made these movies invested years sometimes into the 2 hours, 15 minutes you see. I’m not saying be nice, I’m just saying that understand that it’s a real transaction that’s happening when you put pen to paper, you know?”
When asked why he doesn’t watch his own performances, the Kang actor recently told Higher Learning that he frequently informs his directors, “no disrespect, but I’m probably [not] gonna watch it after this:”
“So I’ve seen that stuff, yeah. I mean, and I can just see a quick image and I’ll go, ‘Oh yeah, cool, cool.’ But I actually– I’m trying to avert my eyes as much as possible… I told my directors like, ‘This is all I get,’ you know what I mean? That’s all I get. I’m not gonna watch your film,” he added. “No disrespect, but I’m probably [not] gonna watch it after this… So, I mean… if my homies are on the screen, I’ll check it out.”
The author of Quantumania, Jeff Loveness, recently discussed his own response to the unfavourable comments, saying that they “took [him] by surprise” and put him in a “pretty low spot.” The author was nonetheless pleased with the prose he produced for Michelle Pfeiffer’s Janet Van Dyne and Majors’ Kang.
The seven most common complaints about Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania are detailed in this article.
Why Jonathan Majors from Ant-Man 3 need not be concerned
Jonathan Majors undoubtedly had a lot to say about his reactions to the unfavourable reviews of Ant-Man 3, but his remarks fundamentally come down to the idea that every spectator has a different viewpoint to offer and a right to their own opinion.
Even if Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania received negative reviews from both critics and viewers, everyone seems to agree on one thing: Jonathan Majors was excellent as Kang. Given the significant future role Kang will play, to some extent, that may have been the most crucial point Quantumania had to establish.
Lately, Majors received almost universal acclaim for his performances as Killian Maddox in Magazine Dreams, Damian in Creed 3, and Kang in Ant-Man 3. Hence, even though Quantumania is proving to be contentious, the Kang actor need not be concerned about how this may impact him in the future.
In fact, given how well-known Majors is in Hollywood, this might help him advance his career in the future. One can only imagine what the actor would make of the Ant-Man and The Wasp sequel if he were to watch it himself, but sadly neither fans nor Majors will ever find out because he avoids watching his own work.
In theatres currently is Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania.
One thought on “Reviews for Ant-Man: Quantumia are disappointing, and Kang the actor speaks up about the bad reception.”